˿(www.xys.org)(xys1.dyndns.org)(groups.yahoo.com/group/xys)

ṩЩ֪ʶ



ܸлĵ飬һйֱͥеĹ涨δʵ
жӦ׼ȷġֻһССĲ䡣٣
Ժ߷Ժ߷Ժͳġ߷Ժ
ԺеҲѡٲÿ˹ݡûʱȷͳƣ
һϢԲĸݵܷġҸоκһԺͥеֱ
ǡ顣Ӱ˵ġ顱ָɭǰʮ
ݵʱݵķɹ涨ֱֱͥͥУ
ûмκһԺİ(ų©)δǷı䣬Ŀ
ȻĹ涨ٿֱĳԺ߷Ժ
ĳһֱľԺ߷ԺҪֱֳ
Ļءͳص㣺аѭķ
ͨȫܹ֮֮߸(ķ
ҪԺֱֳͥԺ޷ͨ䶯)

еֱвڿԺͥ
߷ԺΪֽרߡפͥʱڱԺ
(ҽʱĻȡȥ߷Ժһοͷۣ
һΣ)߷ԺоҲٵ֤һĿȻ
ܹСֵһǣλ󷨹ٺовͬͶƱ
ΪԺоҲоڷ߷
Ժϯ󷨹 William Rehnquist 2001216սPBSĿCharlie Rose
ʱһ̸(ԭwww.americanlawyer.comܲ鵽)˽һЩԺ
ھǷֱͥʱĹǣ

On whether there should be more public scrutiny of, and access to, the 
Court.
"I don't think so, no ... . Well, it is the most transparent of the three
branches of government ... . Every petition for certiorari that's filed
with us comes in the front door. It's disposed of in an order that goes out
the front door. And there's no doubt about what has happened to it. Every
case that we grant certiorari on is briefed. Briefs are a matter of public
record. Oral argument. We do not televise it, but ... the press covers it,
and there are spectators attendant. Our conference is confidential, but 
that's necessary in order that we can be perfectly frank in our deliberations.
The opinions that decide these cases are filed with the clerk and immediately
available on the Internet or at the clerk's office so that there's no doubt
that ... everything that we handle is disposed and disposed of publicly."

On televising court proceedings. "I think that, in the first place, we are
not interested in becoming media personalities. We kind of value what anonymity
we have. And secondly, the extent to which any televised proceedings would
be shown is obviously not going to convey the whole depth of the proceeding.
I mean, we are engaged in very serious work. We are deciding whether, you
know, a particular issue is going to be decided one way or the other. And
we are doing it in a courtroom that is full of lawyers, full of spectators.
And an exchange between a justice and a lawyer simply doesn't convey that
idea at all. And I think also in some jurisdictions where they have tried
televising, there's a feeling that it affects the way at least the lawyers
behave. And I suspect it may affect the way judges behave, too."

(Ůʿ)⣬οѧԺտʼѧϰʱ
Ƶ⡣⼸ôѧԺϴԡģȤѧϰԽã
ԽأԽоӾرǶԲԼרķ򲻸
½ۡĹŵ֣Ҫͼ״Ҫֵж
(Ҹ˾ƵڱףȻⲢӦ˾
ϵռλ)ҵҪԴĶԺʵϰʱĹ۲졣
άĺܳ(ԭĵhttp://hntex.8u8.com/chinese/works/34.htm)
ֻһ£ñȽȫ棬òչҵĽܣֲһ
ֵĲ㡣ҲΪҵбʳ롣ֻϸ
ʱֱӱļֵжϡټӡĺҶͬŶʵ
϶һȨٲַʹ߷ԺҲһ㲻ŵʵ
顣Է⣬ϵûзȨƷž
ΪΪŶԷɵòԶ׼Ĵ󣬶
ʹһȨʱҲ֮һ棬ʹǶʵ϶Ҳкֶܶ
ŵáҹ۲죬ҪֶΡһǷٿԾټ
Ŷֱо(summary judgment, ҵķ룬й
ɽͨ)һ£ʵ϶ĻᶼûС°
кټڷ°кܳĵͳƣİУ
Լ90ǲеġֻне10еĲְʵ
С ûжԴ˽кʵҵľ飬Ӧ²Ժʵ
ϰУJames J. Bradyٴֻһ°
šBradyٸ˾ټĵһ
(ٺ֣һĹʮȤBradyٵ
ͬҷϸ)Ƿٿ֤ͨݲþ(evidenciary
ruling)Щ֤ȡЩ֤ݲȡںܴ
Լʵ϶еá

ɽʵ϶ֿġԵ˵ʵ϶(
ʵ)СȨ ܹͳҲ²ڷɽ
()ϣСȨ  һãҵĸ˾
ǣ˾忴ӰԶԶڶʵĽ
ȻŶʵ϶ԷõӰҲҪɻȱָ
ִƶ£ٸ÷ɣŸ϶ʵǴڷ
ٺ֮Ͷֹֹ֮ԭҪźͷپв
ͬسƣپͨɣ϶ʵҪͨʶǣʵ϶
ҪɵָٱΪԱġɽڡʱʦˡָ
÷Ҫרҵѵͬ϶ʵ
ͨʶ(עи)һϣԱͷٲ޲
ͬˣ϶ʵϻз߱ ƣž
ж˼ġ塯 ҶƵһµġҸ
ΪƵޣڷеӰսС
˾رмֱŵʮǵġƾ
أбȽȫ˾ʵеͲ
׸

ŵġط֮Ȩ򡰷Ȩ ѧϰδӴ(
ԼѧϰϱȽɢ)Ҳҵ˾ʵʾ鲻ųƷ
չй˹涨ں벿Ҳָ1895꣬߷Ժڡʷ
(Sparf v. United States)һУܾԺ
ȨԭʱҲѾܾԭˡ һҵʵ
˵ѾӵдȨʱĻҽĺʵһ¡

ڡ족ķݱǳȤ˽һ̶ơ
Ļаÿ˹һɽֹڹ졣һJohnson
ʾзȻջٹ죬̷˰ߵ߷Ժ
߷ԺԶƱþݷΥܷһƹɡ
Ĺ涨ЧӡҲͨйؽֹķɣҲ
ԺΥܶ޷Ч߷ԺپƷ()ƶķ
ǵ죡߷ԺܷĽͣҪƷо(ǷԺԼ
)ֻͨ޸ܷڵġɡչ˺ƺƵġ˶
ܷǳѣȫͶƱ(˵Ļ»
ͨˣ鶼ʾ֧ͨƷ)Ҫᳬ
֮Ա֧֣Ҫһ(ӡʮ)ķ֮
ͨ(һֻҪͨ)ιڡ족
ܷڡȨɡ(֧άɱȨʿ)˹ؼ
زܷۡ1787ƶֻͨ˶ʮѶȿ֪
߷ԺΥȨƵĹؼɡΡ
ʷչԵ͹

ṩһЩοϡ

ڡ족
-- Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), available at 
http://supct.law.cornell.
edu/supct/cases/name.htm#Case_Name-T.  оBrennan󷨹ִʣ
Rehnquistϯ󷨹ִʣǾʵģֵһ
-- Robert Justin Goldstein, Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas
v. Johnson (University of Kansas Press, 2000).
-- ڡ顱־1995ĳһ(4 5ڣ̫ǵ)Ҳƪ½ܴ


ƣŶУ
-- Cornelius P. Callahan, The Search for Truth: An Introduction to the Jury
Trial Process (Sextant Press, 1997).
-- Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., American Civil Procedure: An Introduction (Yale
Contemporary Law, 1994).
-- ҾάĿϸȫ棬ɹοƪдרҵʿ
ģ֪ǷкõĽƵͨ鼮

˾ϵ߷Ժ
-- William H. Rehquist, The Supreme Court (2001). ߷Ժ
ϯ󷨹׫дͨŶ
-- һ۷ľ---ʼǡ ƪ̸кؽڶ
εʮ־ȷԭµhttp://www.csdn.net.cn/century/index.htm

˵һ㡣ĺ͹ʮֻɬӣƶ֮
֤޶δרҵѵ˺ҵɵȫòȤ˿
˰һ(ѧԺѧ˰Ϸ)й
ǳֱףΪͨڽܡԽԽʦãû
кõʦڵķȨͺܿܵòšҲε
һ׶ˡԺһ򣬹øڻдо
߷ԺBrennan󷨹(Texas v. Johnson )һܺõĵ䷶

ҵΪڡ ṩܶʵĽǶȡ
ÿռеϢ޵ġԼ޵Ϣжϣʹȷ
Ҳǡ ｫҵϢṩο лл

֣ڡǷԲɱΣҰ̳߶ȡȥ꣬
̷ķչѲ˽⡣ҹ̶ȡӪǷ
ģ۹̶ȵȣΪʱǵء
лл

˿(www.xys.org)(xys1.dyndns.org)(groups.yahoo.com/group/xys)